Dubai Foster Care Committee Revokes Mothers’ Custody in High-Profile Cases
<p>In a significant move underscoring the <strong>UAE’s focus on child protection</strong>, the <strong>Foster Care Committee at Dubai’s Personal Status Court</strong> has recommended revoking maternal custody in several high-profile disputes, after uncovering situations deemed harmful to children’s wellbeing.</p><p>Officials explained that the committee’s central role is to <strong>prioritise the child’s welfare over parental attachment</strong>, and that a bond with the mother cannot in itself justify custody if the child faces risks under her supervision.</p><h3>Field-Based Custody Assessments</h3><p>Ahmed Abdul Karim, Chairman of the Foster Care Committee, said custody decisions rely on <strong>evidence-based investigations</strong>.</p><p>“The committee plays a critical field role in custody disputes,” he said. “We visit the child’s home, school, and surrounding environment, gather social, psychological, field, and legal evidence, and prepare a detailed report for the court. We assess the child’s environment, potential harm, level of attachment, and any signs of neglect or behavioural issues. The final decision rests with the presiding judge.”</p><p>The seven-member committee includes representatives from <strong>Dubai Police</strong>, the <strong>Community Development Authority</strong>, the <strong>Dubai Health Authority</strong>, <strong>Dubai Courts</strong>, and a dedicated social worker. Their joint expertise ensures a holistic assessment of both physical and psychological wellbeing.</p><h3>Case 1: Teenage Daughter Out Late</h3><p>In one case, a father complained that his 14-year-old daughter was frequently allowed by her mother to stay out late at night without proper supervision.</p><p>The mother defended her parenting style, saying teenagers require freedom to avoid rebellion. However, the committee’s interview with the girl confirmed the father’s concerns, as she admitted to regular unsupervised outings.</p><p>Given the risks associated with adolescence, the committee concluded that the father showed greater vigilance and recommended transferring custody to him. The court approved the recommendation.</p><h3>Case 2: Children Left with Housemaid</h3><p>In another instance, a father argued that his children were often left alone with a housemaid while their mother went out late at night.</p><p>School reports showed a decline in academic performance, while field investigations confirmed repeated absences. Although the mother claimed she was attending family obligations, the committee determined that prolonged reliance on domestic staff compromised the children’s upbringing. Custody was therefore reassigned to the father.</p><h3>Case 3: Stranger in the Home</h3><p>Perhaps the most sensitive case involved allegations that a man was frequently staying in the mother’s home while her young son was present. The mother insisted he was merely a neighbour who had once visited to fix a television.</p><p>However, during interviews, the eight-year-old boy described the man in detail, noting his habits of “watching matches, smoking, and wearing shorts” in their living room. The committee deemed the child’s account credible, ruling that the presence of an unrelated man posed a clear risk to the boy’s upbringing. Custody was revoked accordingly.</p><h3>Case 4: Mistreatment by Mother’s Friend</h3><p>In a separate matter, a nine-year-old girl alleged mistreatment at the hands of her mother’s friend. The mother denied wrongdoing, suggesting the father had exaggerated the claim. After interviewing the child and conducting field assessments, however, the committee confirmed her account. Custody was revoked, with the girl removed from what was deemed an unsafe environment.</p><h3>Balancing Expertise and Compassion</h3><p>Abdul Karim highlighted that committee members are chosen for <strong>professional suitability and expertise</strong>, not personal characteristics such as marital status. The current panel includes three men and four women, striking what he called a <strong>professional and emotional balance</strong> essential for sensitive cases.</p><p>He stressed that while the mother-child bond is deeply valued, custody decisions must reflect <strong>objective evidence of safety and wellbeing</strong>: “A child’s welfare always outweighs parental preference. Custody cannot remain with a parent who, knowingly or unknowingly, places their child at risk.”</p><h3>Broader Implications</h3><p>The committee’s recent decisions reflect a <strong>shifting emphasis in UAE family law</strong>, where child welfare is increasingly prioritised over traditional assumptions of maternal custody. Legal observers note that while mothers have historically been preferred custodians in the region, courts are now more willing to intervene when evidence of neglect, leniency, or unsafe environments emerges.</p><p>For parents, the cases serve as a reminder that <strong>custody is a responsibility, not a right</strong>—and that the court will step in when a child’s safety or development is threatened.</p>